branta

By Jeanne Haffner PhD

Download article as PDF

Postmodern theorists writing in the late 20th-century once surmised that, during an era of airplanes, cell phones, and the Internet, the importance of geographical space was quickly diminishing. The French anthropologist Marc Augé, for example, famously claimed that modern technological developments such as these had led to a homogenization of culture that was reflected in the proliferation of “non-places” (non-lieux) that were devoid of any particular cultural identity. For him, a perfect example was the airport: surrounded by impersonal signs and identified by government-issued documents that cloaked individuality, travelers waiting for a plane epitomized the late 20th-century transitory experience and its lack of concern for place, cultural particularity, and personal identity.

The graphic presentation of infrastructural data yields more than a map.

The following images demonstrate that, whether or not the importance of geographical space has diminished, the representation of topographical space certainly has not. The fusillade of modern technological advances over the last several decades has only precipitated an explosion in cartographic curiosity and related explorations into data visualization. The very existence of multiple websites and conferences devoted to exploring innovative ways of depicting infrastructure cartographically begs two key questions: What lies behind this surge in the production of maps of all kinds, from simple delineations of proposed high-speed rail projects in the United States to more creative ventures in “experimental geography”? What does the practice of cartography allow us to see that we would not otherwise have seen?

Most fundamentally, mapping illustrates where elements of what we choose to include under the umbrella term “infrastructure” are currently located or planned. In turn, this information can be used to illuminate a whole range of other trends. For example, some major newspapers have recently shown how Obama’s planned infrastructure projects tend to overlap areas that supported him on the campaign trail. Yet, going further, the abstraction involved in this process also serves a more philosophical function: It moves us to reflect upon the spaces in which we live and work. Removed from the chaos of everyday life at the street-level, the geometrical forms of transportation networks, roadways, and even healthcare policies become visible, and therefore more comprehensible. Like a child staring into an Etch-a-Sketch, we are tempted to imagine alternative transit systems and links between disparate places, not to mention the political and economic structures that produced them. The widespread practice of visualizing infrastructure, therefore, is not solely about concrete projects. It is a medium for self-reflection. In the words of the anthropologist Clifford Geertz, one might say that infrastructure is “good to think with.”

Read article at Architecture Boston and see the other stunning graphics.